首页> 外文OA文献 >Preanalytical external quality assessment of the Croatian Society of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine and CROQALM: finding undetected weak spots
【2h】

Preanalytical external quality assessment of the Croatian Society of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine and CROQALM: finding undetected weak spots

机译:克罗地亚医学生物化学与检验医学学会和CROQALM的分析前外部质量评估:发现未发现的薄弱点

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Introduction: The aim of this paper is to present results of first two years of preanalytical external quality assessment (EQA) in Croatia.Materials and methods: This paper summarizes results from 6 rounds of preanalytical EQA during 2014-2016 in 161-175 Croatian laboratories (number ranged between cycles). EQA was designed as an online survey of the compliance with National recommendations for phlebotomy (NRP). Forty-seven questions in 5 categories are analyzed (materials and equipment, patient identification, patient preparation, sampling and storage). Additionally, preanalytical cases are presented. Overall performance scores (Question score (Qscore) for compliance with NRP and Case score (Cscore) for preanalytical cases) are calculated for each question/case as a proportion of laboratories with satisfactory procedure (x 100). Qscores and Cscores ? 70 were classified as acceptable (maximal score = 100).Results: In investigation of compliance with NRP, acceptable Qscores were obtained for 34/47 questions. The lowest scores were observed for the availability of sterile disposable tourniquets (Qscore = 15) and safe-sharp needles (Qscore = 34), obtaining patients address as an identifier (Qscore = 21), using glycolysis inhibitor tubes for glucose concentration measurement (Qscore = 21) and verification of manufacturers declarations on temperature and time of storage (Qscore = 31). There was no statistically significant difference in overall Qscore according to different categories of phlebotomy procedures (P = 0.284). The results of preanalytical cases showed acceptable Cscore values for all cases (89-96).Conclusion: First two years of preanalytical EQA showed good compliance with the NRP and excellent expertise in resolving complex preanalytical issues. Major critical spots are lack of availability of safe-sharp needles, disposable tourniquets and glucose inhibitor tubes.
机译:简介:本文的目的是介绍克罗地亚前两年的分析前外部质量评估(EQA)的结果。材料和方法:本文总结了161-175克罗地亚实验室在2014-2016年期间进行的6轮分析前质量评估的结果。 (周期之间的数字)。 EQA被设计为对国家静脉放血建议(NRP)遵守情况的在线调查。分析了5个类别中的47个问题(材料和设备,患者识别,患者准备,采样和存储)。此外,还介绍了分析前的案例。总体绩效分数(符合NRP的问题分数(Qscore)和分析前案例的案例分数(Cscore))是每个问题/案例的一部分,计算结果令人满意,其实验室操作步骤令人满意(x 100)。 Qscores和Cscores? 70个被评为可接受(最高分= 100)。结果:在对NRP的依从性调查中,针对34/47个问题获得了可接受的Qscore。无菌一次性止血带(Qscore = 15)和安全锋利的针头(Qscore = 34)的可用性得分最低,使用糖酵解抑制剂管进行葡萄糖浓度测量(Qscore)获得患者地址作为标识符(Qscore = 21)。 = 21)并验证制造商关于温度和储存时间的声明(Qscore = 31)。根据不同的放血程序类别,总体Qscore差异无统计学意义(P = 0.284)。分析前案例的结果表明,所有案例的Cscore值均可接受(89-96)。结论:分析前EQA的前两年显示出对NRP的良好遵守以及解决复杂分析前问题的出色专业知识。主要的关键点是缺乏安全的锋利针头,一次性止血带和葡萄糖抑制剂管。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号